@thesis{thesis,
		author={Setyanto  Albertus Fajar },
		title ={IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 81 KUHAP MENGENAI GANTI RUGI DALAM PRA PERADILAN},
		year={2008},
		url={http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/8325/},
		abstract={Compensation in pre judicature is ruled in the Article of Criminal Procedure Code, Whereas the implementation was based on the Article 95 and Article 96 of Criminal Procedure Code. In order to fulfil the compensation which is granted in pre judicature session it is significantly ruled in the Financial Ministerial Decision Number 983/KMK.01/1983 dated December 31 St of 1983. By the existence of this regulations, it seems thet the fulfilment of compensation in pre judicature makes the applicant in the indictment of detriment as the victims for the second time, because in fulfilment is not conducted as once and faster, however it should be based on the periodical terms, which follows to the hierarchy of a leadership in the related instances. In this research, it was exposed to the matters related to the investigation and indictment of detriment. In this legal wraiting, it is hoped that the implementation of compensation was is conducted by certain rule or by the periodical term which has been determined, because so long, the fulfilment of compensation was not ruled certainly to its fulfilment, thus someones rights toward its legal fault could be relieved sooner.}
		}