@thesis{thesis,
		author={YUSUF MARS  G2R1 16 011},
		title ={ANALISIS HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS
DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA
(Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kendari Nomor: 405/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. Kdi)},
		year={2019},
		url={http://repo.uho.ac.id/549/},
		abstract={ABSTRACT
Yusuf Mars, G2 R1 16 0111, Legal Analysis of Proof Against the Verdict
in the Case of The Crime of Narcotics (a Study of the Court’sDecision of Kendari
of Number: 405/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Kdi).
This study aims to find out and analyze the legal considerations and
decisions of judges in the decision number: 405/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. Kdi already in
accordance with legal provisions and to find out and analyze provisions for proof
in number cases: 405/Pid.Sus/2017/PN with applicable legal provisions.
This type of research is law normative research type. Law normative
research type is a process for finding a rule of law, law principles, or law
doctrines to answer legal problems faced.
The results of this study indicate that legal considerations and judges'
decisions in this case are in principle in accordance with statutory provisions. The
judge in considering the imposition of this case decision is based on consideration
of balance in terms of the conditions specified by the Act or the indictment of the
Public Prosecutor. However, the Judge did not assess ownership or control of a
narcotics in the purpose and purpose. Proof in this case is in accordance with the
provisions of the Act where proof in this case is proof that is built on the Act
Positive. Proof in this case does not lead to proof of the abuse of authority of the
defendant as an investigator who violates the Standard Operating Procedure for
storing the Tester which is also a violation of the National Code of Ethics of the
National Police.
keywords: Law of Proof, Evidentiary Ruling, The Criminal Offence of Narcotic}
		}