DETAIL DOCUMENT
Perbandingan Metode K-Medoids Dan K-Means Dalam Pengelompokan Data Load Profile Pelanggan AMR (AUTOMATIC METER READING) PT. PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Institut Teknologi Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Author
Wullur, Ferdinand Hendrik
Asri, Yessy
Kuswardani, Dwina
Subject
Teknik Informatika 
Datestamp
2022-09-28 02:24:57 
Abstract :
The AMR (Automatic Meter Reading) system implemented by PT. PLN (Persero) is used in order to detect losses (loss of electrical energy). Non-technical shrinkage is a type of shrinkage that has a major role in electrical power losses. By comparing the K-Medoids and K-Means Clustering methods, it can help to see how optimal the clusters formed in the customer load profile data grouping and the Davies-Bouldin Index method are used to determine which cluster sets are optimal for grouping, the final result is a diagram that can be used. used as a reference for the power usage status of the customer. In the K-Medoids process, itself uses 103 (one hundred and three) training data of AMR customer load profiles and gets a cluster set of 4 as the most optimal cluster. The results of this study were found from the comparison of the Davies-Bouldin Index value and the accuracy level of data grouping using the Confusion Matrix, the K-Means DBI value was 0.893 while the K-Medoids was 1.991, but in the accuracy of grouping, the K-Medoids data was superior to K-Means with a K value. -Medoids 78.59% and K-Means value 60%. 
Institution Info

Institut Teknologi Perusahaan Listrik Negara