PERBANDINGAN METODE TOPSIS DAN SAW PADA SISTEM PENILAIAN KINERJA PT. PERMATA KARYA JASA PGN GROUP
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Institut Teknologi Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Author
Mulya, Nita Candra
Ningrum, Rahma Farah
Yosrita, Efy
Ningrum, Rahma Farah
Yosrita, Efy
Subject
Teknik Informatika
Datestamp
2022-09-26 06:47:39
Abstract :
Performance assessment system is a need-to-have system in an organization. Performance assessment can help to increase the employee?s work performance, salary adjustment, career planning and development, placement decision, promotion to be permanent employee, and to scoring the performance and achievement in purpose to increase the productivity and competency level of the employee and his/her company. This researcher compared between two Decision-Support System methods which are Technique For Order Preference by SimiIarity to IdeaI SoIution (TOPSIS) and SimpIe Additive Weighting Method (SAW) because of their simple conception, easy to understand, and able to measure the relative performance from some relatives that can help to solve the problem of performance assessment by ranking the alternatives that have been determined, where the criterias consist of 70% for Productivity, 15% for Culture, and 15% for Competency with determined weighted value and from the result of these two methods? running time. By the highest value of these two methods? results, one of the employees will be decided as the alternative of the most outstanding employee. After doing this comparison, the difference between these two methods? results have been found. From TOPSIS, V1 is decided as alternative with 0.826 as the best value and from SAW obtained score 0.97 as the best value. On the other hands, one name of employees has been obtained as the most outstanding employee from these two methods? results
Performance assessment system is a need-to-have system in an organization. Performance assessment can help to increase the employee?s work performance, salary adjustment, career planning and development, placement decision, promotion to be permanent employee, and to scoring the performance and achievement in purpose to increase the productivity and competency level of the employee and his/her company. This researcher compared between two Decision-Support System methods which are Technique For Order Preference by SimiIarity to IdeaI SoIution (TOPSIS) and SimpIe Additive Weighting Method (SAW) because of their simple conception, easy to understand, and able to measure the relative performance from some relatives that can help to solve the problem of performance assessment by ranking the alternatives that have been determined, where the criterias consist of 70% for Productivity, 15% for Culture, and 15% for Competency with determined weighted value and from the result of these two methods? running time. By the highest value of these two methods? results, one of the employees will be decided as the alternative of the most outstanding employee. After doing this comparison, the difference between these two methods? results have been found. From TOPSIS, V1 is decided as alternative with 0.826 as the best value and from SAW obtained score 0.97 as the best value. On the other hands, one name of employees has been obtained as the most outstanding employee from these two methods? results
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
