ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PEKERJAAN PELAT LANTAI KONVENSIONAL DENGAN PELAT LANTAI
PRECAST HOLLOW CORESLAB ( PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR LABORATORIUM GEDUNG GENOMIC PAKET 2CIBINONG BOGOR )
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Institut Teknologi Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Author
MEGAWATI, MEITRI
Sm, Hastanto
Sm, Hastanto
Subject
Teknik Sipil
Datestamp
2022-09-20 04:10:39
Abstract :
The construction method is one of the factors that determine the time and cost of the project. Conventional methods and precast concrete are one form of method that is often used in the construction of building structures. Of course, each method has advantages and disadvantages. Both interms of cost and time efficiency. In this study, a comparison of floor slab work using conventional methods and precast hollow core slabs on the Genomic Building Laboratory Infrastructure Development project package 2 Cibinong, Bogor, used in this study is the unit price of the city of Bogor, as well as some work plans or shop drawings. Based on a comparative analysis of the cost and time of floor slab work with conventional methods and precast hollow core slabs, it was found that for conventional floor slab work with conventional methods it took 70 days with a total work cost of Rp. 2.883.811.000,- (Two billion eight hundred eighty three million eight hundred eleven thousand rupiah)As for the floor slab work using the precast hollow core slab method, it takes 84 days to work with a total work cost of Rp. 2.133.080.000,- (two billion one hundred thirty three million and eighty thousand rupiah). So it can be concluded in terms of cost that working on floor slabs using conventional methods is more expensive than working on floor slabs using precast hollow core slabs. However, in terms of processing time, the conventional method saves more time for 14 days.
The construction method is one of the factors that determine the time and cost of the project. Conventional methods and precast concrete are one form of method that is often used in the construction of building structures. Of course, each method has advantages and disadvantages. Both interms of cost and time efficiency. In this study, a comparison of floor slab work using conventional methods and precast hollow core slabs on the Genomic Building Laboratory Infrastructure Development project package 2 Cibinong, Bogor, used in this study is the unit price of the city of Bogor, as well as some work plans or shop drawings. Based on a comparative analysis of the cost and time of floor slab work with conventional methods and precast hollow core slabs, it was found that for conventional floor slab work with conventional methods it took 70 days with a total work cost of Rp. 2.883.811.000,- (Two billion eight hundred eighty three million eight hundred eleven thousand rupiah)As for the floor slab work using the precast hollow core slab method, it takes 84 days to work with a total work cost of Rp. 2.133.080.000,- (two billion one hundred thirty three million and eighty thousand rupiah). So it can be concluded in terms of cost that working on floor slabs using conventional methods is more expensive than working on floor slabs using precast hollow core slabs. However, in terms of processing time, the conventional method saves more time for 14 days.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
