Abstract :
Corruption that was rooted in each aspect of social life was a latent danger that must
be guarded against and anticipated in a professional, intensive and continuous
manner. The Letter of Instruction to Stopping Investigation as a form authority of the
investigator in carrying out the process of investigation by the principle of law
enforcement: fast, simple, and light cost and to enforce rule of law, that is to clarify
the position of a case whether appropriate to be continued or not demanding process.
The issue of The Letter of Instruction to Stop Investigation in the case of corruption
became the supervision material and the accusation that the investigator did not
complete seriously the case of corruption. Code No. 31/1999 Jo Code No. 20/2001
about Doing an Injustice of Corruption and KUHAP are able to give the description
that are quite explicit about the mechanism of giving of The Letter of Instruction to
Stop Investigation. But, often the deviation from the article 109 (2) KUHAP that
happen in it?s application.
This writing aims to know the issue of The Letter of Instruction to Stop Investigation
in the case of corruption has been in accordance with the current regulation or not. the
research method that was used was the normative law research. From results of the
research, it was found that many cases of corruption, his investigation was stopped
was not in accordance with the law. The nonexistence of the transparency in gave
The Letter of Instruction to Stop Investigation made the function of the supervision
are difficult.
From this writing, the writer gave the suggestion as the form of the recommendation
for the improvement of law enforcement to forward, investigator do more selective
and responsible in gave The Letter of Instruction to Stop Investigation, especially in
the case of corruption. It is also need the existence of the transparency as the form of
responsibility to the public.