Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Protein Urine Metode Asam Asetat 5%, Asam Sulfosalisilat 20%, Carik Celup Secara Visual Dan
Carik Celup Secara Otomotis
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas
Author
Yana, Lucky Destri
Subject
QD Chemistry
Datestamp
2020-05-13 05:23:48
Abstract :
Background :The laboratory examination of urine protein can be performed using 20% sulfosalisilat acid and dip strip method. Strip the dye can be read visually or using automated tools. Visual readout is done by matching the color of the color scale changes that are automatically performed using a urine analyzer. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in the urine protein test results 5% acetic acid method, sulfosalisilat acid 20%, strip visually dye and dye strips automatically. Method :Observational research is carried out with comparative cross-sectional approach. A sample of urine with minimal trace levels of protein. Sample was taken by purposive sampling of 15 samples, each sample of urine examination urine protein using four different methods is the method of 5% acetic acid, 20% sulfosalisilat acid, a method to read strip immersion visual and dye strip method is read automatically. Results:Based on the statistical test values obtained using the Test Freadmen 0.000 <0.05, so there are differences in the urine protein test results 5% acetic acid method, sulfosalisilat acid 20%, strip visually dye and dye strips automatically Conclusion: The results showed there was no significant difference between urine protein examination results of visual dipstick method and automated dipstick sig.(2 tailed) 0,317 > 0,025. Method but there was a significant difference with between urine protein examination results of using acetic acid 5%, sulfosalisilic acid 20% method with visual dipstick method and automated dipstick method with sig. (2-tailed) 0,0000 < 0,005
Background :The laboratory examination of urine protein can be performed using 20% sulfosalisilat acid and dip strip method. Strip the dye can be read visually or using automated tools. Visual readout is done by matching the color of the color scale changes that are automatically performed using a urine analyzer. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in the urine protein test results 5% acetic acid method, sulfosalisilat acid 20%, strip visually dye and dye strips automatically. Method :Observational research is carried out with comparative cross-sectional approach. A sample of urine with minimal trace levels of protein. Sample was taken by purposive sampling of 15 samples, each sample of urine examination urine protein using four different methods is the method of 5% acetic acid, 20% sulfosalisilat acid, a method to read strip immersion visual and dye strip method is read automatically. Results:Based on the statistical test values obtained using the Test Freadmen 0.000 <0.05, so there are differences in the urine protein test results 5% acetic acid method, sulfosalisilat acid 20%, strip visually dye and dye strips automatically Conclusion: The results showed there was no significant difference between urine protein examination results of visual dipstick method and automated dipstick sig.(2 tailed) 0,317 > 0,025. Method but there was a significant difference with between urine protein examination results of using acetic acid 5%, sulfosalisilic acid 20% method with visual dipstick method and automated dipstick method with sig. (2-tailed) 0,0000 < 0,005
File :
TLM-2019-1534004-cover.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-abstract.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-conclusion.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-reference.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-attachment.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-complete.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-abstract.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-tableofcontent.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-chapter1.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-chapter2.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-chapter2.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-chapter3.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-chapter4.pdf
TLM-2019-1534004-conclusion.pdf
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
