Perbedaan Hasil Rapid Test Antigen Standard Q Covid-19 Dengan Rapid Test Antigen Ecotest Covid-19 Pada Pasien Terduga Infeksi Covid-19 Di Rumah Sakit Karya Asih Charitas Kenten Tahun 2021
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas
Author
Siringoringo, Emriana
Subject
RZ Other systems of medicine
Datestamp
2021-09-17 02:42:46
Abstract :
Background: Antigen rapid test is a new technology that can detect SARS-CoV-2 directly, just as RT-PCR detects the virus directly. Antigen rapid test, good for detecting viruses in the acute phase, does not require an incubation period for positive results to appear, does not require special laboratory specifications for processing, the types of products are diverse and easy to obtain in the market. Objective: To determine the difference in the results of the Standard Q Antigen rapid test and the Ecotest Antigen rapid test in patients suspected of being infected with COVID-19 Methods: The type of research that will be used in this research is qualitative (non-parametric) research with a comparative approach. The Standard Q Antigen rapid test and Ecotest Antigen rapid test were used to detect COVID-19 infection in nasopharyngeal swab samples taken from inpatients in the ARI treatment room suspected of being infected with COVID-19. Samples were accommodated in extract buffer tubes, extracted and examined on the Cased Card Antigen Rapid Test Standard Q Kit and Ekotest Antigen Rapid Test. The results of the COVID-19 examination were analyzed by the paired McNemar test with a 95% confidence level. Results: From 38 samples of subjects studied, 29 tests (76, 32%) were positive with the Rapid test Antigen Standard Q, 30 tests (78, 94%) were positive with the rapid test Antigen Ecotest. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the Standard Q Covid-19 Antigen Rapid Test Results with the Covid-19 Ecotest Antigen Rapid Test (p=1,000) Suggestion: Standard Q Antigen rapid test and Ecotest Antigen rapid test can be used for the examination of SARS-CoV-2 in patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection. Subsequent studies compared rapid Antigen with RT-PCR in People Without Symptoms
Background: Antigen rapid test is a new technology that can detect SARS-CoV-2 directly, just as RT-PCR detects the virus directly. Antigen rapid test, good for detecting viruses in the acute phase, does not require an incubation period for positive results to appear, does not require special laboratory specifications for processing, the types of products are diverse and easy to obtain in the market. Objective: To determine the difference in the results of the Standard Q Antigen rapid test and the Ecotest Antigen rapid test in patients suspected of being infected with COVID-19 Methods: The type of research that will be used in this research is qualitative (non-parametric) research with a comparative approach. The Standard Q Antigen rapid test and Ecotest Antigen rapid test were used to detect COVID-19 infection in nasopharyngeal swab samples taken from inpatients in the ARI treatment room suspected of being infected with COVID-19. Samples were accommodated in extract buffer tubes, extracted and examined on the Cased Card Antigen Rapid Test Standard Q Kit and Ekotest Antigen Rapid Test. The results of the COVID-19 examination were analyzed by the paired McNemar test with a 95% confidence level. Results: From 38 samples of subjects studied, 29 tests (76, 32%) were positive with the Rapid test Antigen Standard Q, 30 tests (78, 94%) were positive with the rapid test Antigen Ecotest. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the Standard Q Covid-19 Antigen Rapid Test Results with the Covid-19 Ecotest Antigen Rapid Test (p=1,000) Suggestion: Standard Q Antigen rapid test and Ecotest Antigen rapid test can be used for the examination of SARS-CoV-2 in patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection. Subsequent studies compared rapid Antigen with RT-PCR in People Without Symptoms
File :
1. TLM-2021-2034018-Cover.pdf
2. TLM-2021-2034018-abstract.pdf
11. TLM-2021-2034018-Complete.pdf
12. TLM-2021-2034018-summry_id.pdf
3.TLM-2021-2034018-Tableofcontent.pdf
4. TLM-2021-2034018-Chapter 1.pdf
5. TLM-2021-2034018-Chapter 2.pdf
6. TLM-2021-2034018-Chapter 3.pdf
7. TLM-2021-2034018-Chapter 4.pdf
8. TLM-2021-2034018-Conclusion.pdf
9.TLM-2021-2034018-Bibliography.pdf
10. TLM-2021-2034018-Attachment.pdf
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
