Abstract :
Writing is often considered as difficult skill by the student, in addition
other language skills. Generally the students? difficulties can be classified in two
categories: (1)lack of vocabulary and grammar mastery, (2)the difficulties of
developing idea about what they want to write. As a result, student make many
errors in their writing project. Therefore, mistakes are evidence of learning and
must be viewed positively. As foreign language teacher should accept learners?
error as a naturally phenomenon to the process of second language learning.
Therefore, effective learning requires feedback, learning often takes place
best when students have opportunities to express ideas and get feedback from
their teachers or peers. But for feedback to the most helpful to learners, it must
consist of more than the provision of correct answers. Feedback ought to be
analytical, to be suggestive, and to come at the time when students are interested
in it. And then there must be time for students to reflect on the feedback they
receive, to make adjustments and to try again.
This study was descriptive qualitative research. The researcher described
and analyzed the existing phenomena during the teaching learning process. The
subject of this study were the English teacher and the students of second grade at
MA Kanjeng Sepuh Sidayu. The instrument of this research was the researcher
herself who used observation form, depth interview and open-ended
questionnaire.
The questionnaire result showed that most of the students gave positive
responses to error correction feedback. Depth interview to the teacher and
students showed that the effectiveness of error correction feedback toward
students writing skill are it could reduce student error day by day and it also train
the students to take self correction in their writing, which are these two things play
important role in improving students writing.
Error correction is important for writing. However teacher should not
dominate the error correction process. Teacher should give students to self
correction. If teachers and students both understand the purpose of certain
correction, feedback is more likely to be productive.