Abstract :
Grow up of current knowledge led to the whole society comfortable by
these developments, so that people prefer the instant and quickly in any case,
where it causes more people to violate the law emilih m, mi sal in megesahkan a
letter, the more choose falsifying signatures to treat c epat perjanjia process or
manufacture of the letter . This study aims to find out about the accountability of
perpetrators of criminal acts of forgery, which it aims to discuss factors - factors
fraud perpetrators of criminal acts and forms forged the signatures of legal
entanglement for signature forgery. This study uses sociological juridical
methodology. Source data used are secondary data that can be a primary law
materials such as hu Act - Act of 1945, materials hu secondary law works -
scientific papers, draft laws - laws, and also the results - the results of a study,
materials such as bibliographies tertiary hu law, dictionaries and other - other.
Analysis of data obtained using qualitative analysis of the data asking to source.
The results can be summarized in the form factor - the drivers of the perpetrator
in committing a fraud include economic factors, factors and factor law
enforcement science and technology, type - type of signature forgery itself is
included in the forged letter of Article 263 paragraph depend on 1 of the
Criminal Code and Sporiuous Signature or signature essay, forged the signatures
are also included in the types of fraud as our letter n. P er t counterweight judge
in deciding a case of follow forged the signatures, which include behavioral
considerations such as the defendant, the defendant's mental condition, state of
the defendant and the defendant's identity. Different?s decision judges away
with a maximum sentence of paragraph 1 of article 263 of the Criminal Code,
whereas fig Desc six years in case the decision number:
2045/Pid.B/2010/Pn.Sby, my only sanctioned form of confinement for 3 months
in prison.
Keywords: Liability, Forgery Signature