Abstract :
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kinerja PT Krakatau
Steel (Persero) Tbk. sebelum dan sesudah privatisasi serta menguji signifikansi
perubahan tersebut.Privatisasi dipilih sebagai salah satu jalan keluar
meningkatkan efisiensi BUMN dan memaksimalkan keuntungan baik bagi
pertumbuhan perusahaan maupun masyarakat.Kementerian BUMN telah
mengeluarkan Keputusan Menteri BUMN Nomor KEP-100/MBU/2002 tentang
Penilaian Kesehatan BUMN, dan menetapkan indikator/rasio keuangan seperti
ROE, ROI, Cash Ratio, Current Ratio,Total Modal Sendiri Terhadap Aset
(TMSTA), Collection Periods, Perputaran Persediaan, dan Total Aset Turn
Over(TATO), sebagai ukuran kesehatan kinerja BUMN.
Pada penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif
dengan melakukan uji Paired-Samples t Test pada SPSS versi 17 untuk menguji
signifikansi perubahan indikator/rasio dimaksud sebelum dan sesudah privatisasi.
Berdasarakan hasil penelitian, ternyata rasio ROE, ROI, Current Ratio,
Collection Periods dan Total Aset Turn Over (TATO) setelah privatisasi
mengalami penurunan kinerja. Sedangkan Total Modal Sendiri Terhadap Aset
(TMSTA) dan Perputaran Persediaan lebih baik kinerjanya. Di sisi lain, Cash
ratio relatif stabil nilainya setelah privatisasi. Terkait signifikansi, hanya
penurunan TATO yang signifikan. Penurunan sebagian disebabkan adanya
kerugian perusahaan pada tahun 2011-2013 dan tingginya tingkat investasi aset
serta biaya produksi. Untuk itu, perusahaan seharusnya lebih meningkatkan
efisiensi dalam operasional perusahaan sehingga keuntungan perusahaan dapat
dioptimalkan.
Kata Kunci : ROE, ROI, Cash Ratio, Current Ratio, Total Modal Sendiri
Terhadap Aset, Collection Period, Perputaran Persediaan, Total Aset Turn Over //
ABSTRACT
The ultimate purposes of this research are determining the differences of PT
Krakatau Steel?s financial performance before and after privatization as well as
testing the significance of these changes. Privatization is an option to improve
SOE?s efficiency and to optimize profit toward sustainable growth of SOE and
public benefit. However, the aim of privatization is not always succcessfully applied
to the SOE. Ministry of SOE has already issued Ministry of SOE Decree number
KEP-100/MBU/2002 on SOE Financial Health Valuation, and setting up financial
indicators i.e. ROE, ROI, Cash Ratio, Current Ratio, Owners Equity to Assets
Ratio, Collection Period, Inventory Turnover, and Total Asset Turn Over (TATO)
as sets of measurement for financial performance of SOE.
In this research, the author use quantitative descriptive analysis method by
conducting Paired Samples t Test using SPSS version 17 to test the significant
changes of the financial indicators before and after privatization.
Based on the result of the research, apparently ROE, ROI, Current Ratio,
Collection Periods, and Total Aset Turn Over decreased after privatization.
Meanwhile, SOE?s performance reflected by Owners Equity to Assets Ratio and
Inventory Turnover improved. On other hand, Cash ratio after privatization moved
relatively stable. In highlight, the most significant changes in SOE?s financial
performances is the decrease of TATO. The main problem of the financial
performance decrease are firm?s financial loss in 2011-2013 and the SOE is in
investment period (high capital outflow) as well as production cost is relatively
high. Therefore, SOE should improve its operational efficiency in order to optimize
SOE?s profits.
Keywords : ROE, ROI, Cash Ratio, Current Ratio, Owners Equity to Assets Ratio,
Collection Period, Inventory Turnover, and Total Aset Turn Over