Abstract :
Islamic Education in elementary schools is one of the subjects that must be
there and is very important. To fulfill the achievement of Islamic Education (IE)
learning objectives more perfectly, it is necessary to develop Higher Order
Thinking Skills (Higher Order Thinking Skills/HOTS) on IE learning and
assessment so that the questions tested need to be analyzed and also based on
HOTS.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the theoretical quality of the test
subjects of Islamic Education class V SD Budi Mulia T.P. 2019/2020 is based on
HOTS based on aspects of material, construction, language and based on HOTS
based on Bloom's Taxonomy of cognitive domains. This research was conducted
at SD Budi Mulia Medan Jalan Kawat VII No. 105 Tanjung Mulia Hilir District
Medan City Deli Medan North Sumatra Province Postal Code 20241 and the
subject and object of research are Islamic Education teacher class V and IE
questions semester I Class V T.P. 2019/2020.
The research method used is using a qualitative approach and using the
instrument of semester I IE questions and interviews with IE teachers to analyze
the quality of items theoretically based on material, construction and language
aspects and based on quality analysis of HOTS-based items
The results of the study of 35 multiple choice questions obtained the
following results 1) based on the analysis of the item quality aspects of the
material feasibility of 91.42% (32 questions) worth using, there are some
questions that do not meet the criteria such as material that is not in accordance
with the composition, answer choices which is not homogeneous and logical and
the existence of questions that do not have the answer key 2) based on the analysis
of the quality of the aspects of the construction feasibility of 88.57% (31
questions) worthy of use, there are some questions that do not meet the criteria
such as the subject still gives clues to the answer key and the length of the choice
of money answers are not the same, 3) based on the analysis of items about the
aspect of language worthiness of 42.85% (20 questions) worth using, there are
some questions that do not meet the criteria such as using language that is not in
accordance with Indonesian language rules, and the choice of answers repeat the
same word / group of words, 4) Based on an analysis of the quality of items
according to the Bloom domain's taxonomy cognitive can be concluded from 35
multiple choice questions obtained that there are 17 questions (48.6%) including
the LOTS questions category with details C1 (remembering) = 8 questions
(22.8%), b) C2 (understanding) = 3 questions (8 , 7%), C3 (applying) = 6 questions
(17.1%). While the rest included in the HOTS questions category, however all of
them were in the C4 criteria (Analysis) = 18 questions (51.4%) while none of the
questions were in C5 and C6.