Legalitas Akta Dibawah Tangan Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pada Putusan Perdata Np,182/PDT.G/2015/PN.PBR
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Islam Riau
Author
Syafrizal, Adinan
Subject
K Law (General)
Datestamp
2022-03-14 04:21:37
Abstract :
In the judiciary in Indonesia proves is one way of achieving the truth of a matter of law. Evidence of the current letter is indispensable as a proof if in the future a dispute arises. Proof is an important part of the examination process civil cases that will determine the verdict, the evidence deed under the hand is one type of evidence that is lawful The formulation of the problem in this thesis is How the legality of the deed under the hand in the proof of the Civil case No. 182 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr and No. 250 / Pdt.G / 2015 /PN.Pbr and What is the consideration of the judge in determining the legality of the deed under the hand in the proof of the Civil case No. 182 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr and No. 250 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr. In this thesis the author uses the method of normative legal research is research literature. in this paper the research method used is descriptive analytical, which is based on the conditions that are applicable to the data obtained in the study, linked and compared with theories that are applicable to the theme of the thesis, the object in this study deed under hand in the proof of civil lawsuits Pekanbaru District Court of law in the region. Based on what has been stated in the foregoing description can be concluded that the Strength of evidence deed under hand in a civil case, along deed under the hand is not denied or deny the parties the deed under the hand has the same legal force authentic deed, while when the truth of the signature deed under the hand at will deny the truth of the deed must be verified by using other evidence such as witnesses, conjecture and pengakuan.Akta under the hand is deed made without the help of public officials, but rather was made and signed by the parties alone. Regarding the strength of binding of evidence deed under hand in hearing civil cases, based on the decision of the investigation, evidence of receipt of purchase signed by the Defendant filed by the plaintiffs constitute documentary evidence in the form of deed under the hand that has no probative value was perfect like authentic act , The strength of evidence deed under hand in signatures denied, then the judge should order that the truth of the writing or the signature is checked before the courts. If the signature is recognized by the concerned, the deed under the hand that has the strength and become like a perfect proof of an authentic deed. Then The basis for consideration of the judge in determining the evidentiary certificate under the hand of the civil case in hearing civil cases in the District Court of Pekanbaru ie, mail receipt Purchase, signed Handle filed by the plaintiffs constitute documentary evidence in the form of "deed under the hand" that has probative value that is perfect as an authentic deed done in the absence of objection by the respondent and supported by letters of other evidence. Therefore, judges assess it quite as perfect evidence like an authentic deed, the judge finds that the defendant has not been making payments on its debt to the plaintiff.
In the judiciary in Indonesia proves is one way of achieving the truth of a matter of law. Evidence of the current letter is indispensable as a proof if in the future a dispute arises. Proof is an important part of the examination process civil cases that will determine the verdict, the evidence deed under the hand is one type of evidence that is lawful The formulation of the problem in this thesis is How the legality of the deed under the hand in the proof of the Civil case No. 182 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr and No. 250 / Pdt.G / 2015 /PN.Pbr and What is the consideration of the judge in determining the legality of the deed under the hand in the proof of the Civil case No. 182 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr and No. 250 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Pbr. In this thesis the author uses the method of normative legal research is research literature. in this paper the research method used is descriptive analytical, which is based on the conditions that are applicable to the data obtained in the study, linked and compared with theories that are applicable to the theme of the thesis, the object in this study deed under hand in the proof of civil lawsuits Pekanbaru District Court of law in the region. Based on what has been stated in the foregoing description can be concluded that the Strength of evidence deed under hand in a civil case, along deed under the hand is not denied or deny the parties the deed under the hand has the same legal force authentic deed, while when the truth of the signature deed under the hand at will deny the truth of the deed must be verified by using other evidence such as witnesses, conjecture and pengakuan.Akta under the hand is deed made without the help of public officials, but rather was made and signed by the parties alone. Regarding the strength of binding of evidence deed under hand in hearing civil cases, based on the decision of the investigation, evidence of receipt of purchase signed by the Defendant filed by the plaintiffs constitute documentary evidence in the form of deed under the hand that has no probative value was perfect like authentic act , The strength of evidence deed under hand in signatures denied, then the judge should order that the truth of the writing or the signature is checked before the courts. If the signature is recognized by the concerned, the deed under the hand that has the strength and become like a perfect proof of an authentic deed. Then The basis for consideration of the judge in determining the evidentiary certificate under the hand of the civil case in hearing civil cases in the District Court of Pekanbaru ie, mail receipt Purchase, signed Handle filed by the plaintiffs constitute documentary evidence in the form of "deed under the hand" that has probative value that is perfect as an authentic deed done in the absence of objection by the respondent and supported by letters of other evidence. Therefore, judges assess it quite as perfect evidence like an authentic deed, the judge finds that the defendant has not been making payments on its debt to the plaintiff.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
