Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Dakwaan dan Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG.)
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Author
Manan, Abdul
Subject
LAW
Datestamp
2021-10-08 07:16:54
Abstract :
Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan merupakan perbuatan yang sangat membahayakan hidup warga masyarakat Indonesia, tindak pidana pembunuhan secara umum diatur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP, didalam tulisan terdapat beberapa topik permasalahan yaitu penerapan dakwaan pada pasal 338 KUHP oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. dan penerapan petimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan Vonis 4 tahun penjara dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Metode penelitian yang digunakan tipe penelitian, yakni metode pendekatan, tehnik pengumpulan data, dan tehnik pengeloalan data, bahan hukum skunder dari hasil penelitian, Buku-buku, Jurnal, Artikel, internet dan KUHP, serta PUTUSAN PENGADILA NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Berdasarkan Analisis penulis dapatkan 1) Penerapan Dakwaan pada Pasal 338 KUHP oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. dalam dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum sudah jelas karena sudah memenuhi unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP. 2) Penerapan Petimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam menjatuhkan Vonis 4 tahun penjara dalam putusan pengadilan negeri nomor: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Putusan Majelis Hakim dalam tindak pidana Pembunuhan yang dilakukan dengan sengaja ini Sesuai dengan penerapan pasal 338 KUHP, karna Unsur-Unsur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP, yaitu Unsur, Dengan sengaja, Menghilangkan, Nyawa dan Orang lain telah terpenuhi oleh terdakwa di persidangan, sehingga Hakim menjatuhkan Hukuman setimpal terhadap terdakwa Sesuai dengan perbuatan yang dilakukannya. Kata Kunci : Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan, Dakwaan Jaksa / Murder is an act that endangers the lives of Indonesian citizens, the crimeof murder is generally regulated in Article 338 of the Criminal Code, in the writing there are several problem topics, namely the application of the indictment in Article 338 of the Criminal Code by the public prosecutor in DECISION OF THE STATE COURT NUMBER:51/PID.B/ 2015 /PN.SBG. and application of judges' legal considerations in handing down a 4-year prison sentence in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. The research method used is the type of research, namely the approach method, data collection techniques, and data management techniques, secondary legal materials from the results of research, books, journals, articles, internet and the Criminal Code, as well as DECISION OF THE NEGERI COURT NUMBER: 51 / PID.B /2015/PN.SBG. Based on the analysis, the authors get 1) Application of the Indictment in Article 338 of the Criminal Code by the public prosecutor in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER:51/PID.B /2015/PN.SBG. The indictment of the public prosecutor is clear because it has fulfilled the elements in Article 338 of the Criminal Code. 2) Application of Judges' Legal Considerations in handing down a 4-year prison sentence in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER: 51 / PID.B / 2015 / PN.SBG. The verdict of the Panel of Judges in the crime of deliberate murder is in accordance with the application of Article 338 of the Criminal Code, because the elements in Article 338 of the Criminal Code, namely the elements, intentionally disappearing, lives and other people have been fulfilled by the defendant at the trial, so that the judge handed down Punishment in accordance with the defendant in accordance with the actions he committed. Keywords :Murder Crime, Prosecutor's Indictmen
Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan merupakan perbuatan yang sangat membahayakan hidup warga masyarakat Indonesia, tindak pidana pembunuhan secara umum diatur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP, didalam tulisan terdapat beberapa topik permasalahan yaitu penerapan dakwaan pada pasal 338 KUHP oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. dan penerapan petimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan Vonis 4 tahun penjara dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Metode penelitian yang digunakan tipe penelitian, yakni metode pendekatan, tehnik pengumpulan data, dan tehnik pengeloalan data, bahan hukum skunder dari hasil penelitian, Buku-buku, Jurnal, Artikel, internet dan KUHP, serta PUTUSAN PENGADILA NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Berdasarkan Analisis penulis dapatkan 1) Penerapan Dakwaan pada Pasal 338 KUHP oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. dalam dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum sudah jelas karena sudah memenuhi unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP. 2) Penerapan Petimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam menjatuhkan Vonis 4 tahun penjara dalam putusan pengadilan negeri nomor: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. Putusan Majelis Hakim dalam tindak pidana Pembunuhan yang dilakukan dengan sengaja ini Sesuai dengan penerapan pasal 338 KUHP, karna Unsur-Unsur dalam Pasal 338 KUHP, yaitu Unsur, Dengan sengaja, Menghilangkan, Nyawa dan Orang lain telah terpenuhi oleh terdakwa di persidangan, sehingga Hakim menjatuhkan Hukuman setimpal terhadap terdakwa Sesuai dengan perbuatan yang dilakukannya. Kata Kunci : Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan, Dakwaan Jaksa / Murder is an act that endangers the lives of Indonesian citizens, the crimeof murder is generally regulated in Article 338 of the Criminal Code, in the writing there are several problem topics, namely the application of the indictment in Article 338 of the Criminal Code by the public prosecutor in DECISION OF THE STATE COURT NUMBER:51/PID.B/ 2015 /PN.SBG. and application of judges' legal considerations in handing down a 4-year prison sentence in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER: 51/PID.B/2015/PN.SBG. The research method used is the type of research, namely the approach method, data collection techniques, and data management techniques, secondary legal materials from the results of research, books, journals, articles, internet and the Criminal Code, as well as DECISION OF THE NEGERI COURT NUMBER: 51 / PID.B /2015/PN.SBG. Based on the analysis, the authors get 1) Application of the Indictment in Article 338 of the Criminal Code by the public prosecutor in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER:51/PID.B /2015/PN.SBG. The indictment of the public prosecutor is clear because it has fulfilled the elements in Article 338 of the Criminal Code. 2) Application of Judges' Legal Considerations in handing down a 4-year prison sentence in DECISION OF THE COURT NUMBER: 51 / PID.B / 2015 / PN.SBG. The verdict of the Panel of Judges in the crime of deliberate murder is in accordance with the application of Article 338 of the Criminal Code, because the elements in Article 338 of the Criminal Code, namely the elements, intentionally disappearing, lives and other people have been fulfilled by the defendant at the trial, so that the judge handed down Punishment in accordance with the defendant in accordance with the actions he committed. Keywords :Murder Crime, Prosecutor's Indictmen
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
