DETAIL DOCUMENT
Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Cek/Bilyet Giro Kosong Indonesia Dan Malaysia
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Author
Sinaga, Toga Lamhot
Subject
LAW 
Datestamp
2022-07-08 07:56:38 
Abstract :
Polemik pro-kontra terhadap pemberi cek atau bilyet giro kosong. Dengan adanya peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 1964 yang telah dicabut, dan diganti menjadi peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1971 tentang pencabutan larangan penggunaan Cek. Pencabutan peraturan Undang-Undang tersebut sering diabaikan oleh penyidik dan di Tarik ke tindak pidana penipuan sesuai Pasal 378 KUHP. Semula penggunaan cek/giro kosong merupakan perbuatan pidana dan setelah dicabutnya peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 1964 bukan merupakan pidana lagi. Kata kunci. Cek/giro adalah alat bayar./ The Pros and cons polemic to check givers or blank current accounts. and refered to the regulations of constitution Number 17 1964 which was repealed in the regulations of constitution Number 1 1971 which have been revoked, and replaced by regulations of Law Number 1 of 1971 concerning the lifting of the prohibition on the use of checks. The repeal of the law is often ignored by investigators and is subject to criminal acts of fraud in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code. Initially, the use of blank checks / giro was a criminal act and after the revocation of Law Number 17 Year 1964, it non crime act. 
Institution Info

Universitas Kristen Indonesia