Abstract :
The purpose of the research in order to fulfill the requirements of this writing is as
follows: 1) To find out the criminal act of corruption regarding gratification in the form of
sexual services. 2) To find out the technique of proving the fault of the recipient of a pleasure
gift in the form of sexual services as a criminal act of gratification. The type of research used
is the type of normative legal research. That is to provide a complete picture of the positive
legal review, in this case the criminal act of corruption regarding gratification in the form of
sexual services.
The crime of corruption is a very serious crime that is categorized as an extraordinary
crime (extraordinary crime) because its impact is not only detrimental to state finances,
disturbing the stability and security of society, weakening the values of democracy, ethics,
justice and legal certainty, but also has violated the social and economic rights of the
community at large.
Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that 1) The criminal act of
corruption regarding gratification in the form of sexual services. Based on the explanation of
Article 12 B of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption,
the word "other facilities" can be interpreted broadly, so that sexual services can be categorized
as gratuities. However, it must also fulfill the elements of Article 12 B of Law no. 20 of 2001
concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 2) The technique of proving the fault of the
recipient of a pleasure gift in the form of sexual services as a criminal act of gratification is to
prove whether or not all elements of Article 12 B of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the
Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption by using a balanced reverse proof system, in which
both the prosecutor and the defendant are burdened with proof about whether or not sexual
gratification has been given/provided, whether or not the defendant has received, whether or
not the sexual gratification is true or not is gratification. as referred to in Article 12 B of Law
no. 20 of 2001, whether or not the sexual gratification received is related to his/her
position/contrary to his/her obligations and duties. The evidence that can be used to prove the
guilt of the recipient of sexual gratification is evidence that is limitedly regulated in the
provisions of Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely witness
testimony, expert testimony, letters, instructions, statements of the defendant and evidence of
instructions. regulated in the Corruption Law.
Keywords: corruption, gratification, sexual services