ANALISIS PENDAPATAN PETANI HASIL HUTAN BUKAN KAYU POLA KEMITRAAN PADA KESATUAN PENGELOLAAN HUTAN (KPH) DAN STRATEGI PENINGKATANNYA DI PROVINSI JAMBI
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Jambi
Author
Fazriyas, Fazriyas
Junaidi, Junaidi
Safri, Muhammad
Junaidi, Junaidi
Safri, Muhammad
Subject
H Social Sciences (General)
Datestamp
2023-11-13 02:44:32
Abstract :
ABSTRACT ?Analysis Of Non-Timber Forest Product Farmers Income (NTFP) Parternship Pattern To Forest Management Unit (FMU) And Its Improvement Strategy In Jambi Province? Promoter Prof.Dr.H.M.Rachmad,R.SE.MS, Dr.M.Safri.SE.M.Si. as co-promoter, Dr.Ir. Ardi Novra.MP as co-promo The aim of this study is to analyze the factors that influence farmers' income from the Partnership Pattern business in Forest Management Unit (FMU) in Jambi Province, to analyze the effect of forest management unit (FMU) to the NTFP farmers income changes partnership of FMU, to analyze the optimization of economics benefits that Forest Management Unit can be obtained from non-timber forest product business, to analyze the income improvement strategy non-timber forest products farmer in FMU partnership system in Jambi Province. The research method used in this dissertation were survey and observation method. The sampling method was conducted purposively to the forest farmer group of non-timber forest products FMU, FMUP model unit I Kerinci and unit VII Hulu Sarolangun, as well as related stakeholders. The analytical tool used are recursive simultaneous equations, multiple linear equations, linear programming and hierarchical analysis procedures (AHP) based by research model. The results of the study showed that the income of non-timber forest product farmers in honey partnership with FMUP unit I kerinci was an average of IDR 20,861.850/year with the technical management system of NTFP assistance individually, while the income NTFP farmer partnership of KPHP unit VII Sarolangun from in honey average was IDR.141,368 per year and the average of kepayang oil amount IDR 19,460 per year with a group aid management systems. Based on the results of the simultaneous recursive equations that there is no-significant differrent between the type of direct marketing channel and through FMU and the FMUP location to the price sharing received by the NTFP farmer. In addition, the farmers's income from Non-timber forest product in a partnerships pattern is significantly influenced by the variable share of the price received by farmers, the amount of NTFP production, harvesting time, the number of family labor incomes, the type of NTFP commodity, the main income of farmers others than NTFPs, and the NTFP management system. Then the existence of KPH as a farmer partner has a significant different on income changes of NTFP farmers, namely the intensity of technology adoption variable, variation in price information, the type of NTFP commodity, farmers capital availabillity, and the NTFP management system (Individual and Group). Furthermore, based on the linear programming analysis, the NTFP business in each FMU faces constraints on the limitations of NTFP raw materials, therefore the optimization of production diversity by the FMUP needs to be adjusted. Priority Strategy for Increasing Income of NTFP Farmers through a partnership pattern through a structural model. The priority factor is the type of NTFP commodity (83%). The structural model of farmers' income from the NTFP business is the priority factors for the type of NTFP commodity (35%), the amount of production (33%), the NTFP partnership management system (32%) Increasing the share of farmers' income from NTFPs towards total farmers' income, the priority factors are farmers' income from NTFPs (39%), total farmers' income (32%), number of workers (29%). Optimizing the NTFP business by KPH with a partnership pattern has 3 priority factors, namely 56% is the production availability factor at the farmer level (raw materials), 24% is the capital availability factor and 20% is the processing factor of NTFP derivative products. Keywords : Non- Timber Forest Product, Partnership, Forest Management Unit.
ABSTRACT ?Analysis Of Non-Timber Forest Product Farmers Income (NTFP) Parternship Pattern To Forest Management Unit (FMU) And Its Improvement Strategy In Jambi Province? Promoter Prof.Dr.H.M.Rachmad,R.SE.MS, Dr.M.Safri.SE.M.Si. as co-promoter, Dr.Ir. Ardi Novra.MP as co-promo The aim of this study is to analyze the factors that influence farmers' income from the Partnership Pattern business in Forest Management Unit (FMU) in Jambi Province, to analyze the effect of forest management unit (FMU) to the NTFP farmers income changes partnership of FMU, to analyze the optimization of economics benefits that Forest Management Unit can be obtained from non-timber forest product business, to analyze the income improvement strategy non-timber forest products farmer in FMU partnership system in Jambi Province. The research method used in this dissertation were survey and observation method. The sampling method was conducted purposively to the forest farmer group of non-timber forest products FMU, FMUP model unit I Kerinci and unit VII Hulu Sarolangun, as well as related stakeholders. The analytical tool used are recursive simultaneous equations, multiple linear equations, linear programming and hierarchical analysis procedures (AHP) based by research model. The results of the study showed that the income of non-timber forest product farmers in honey partnership with FMUP unit I kerinci was an average of IDR 20,861.850/year with the technical management system of NTFP assistance individually, while the income NTFP farmer partnership of KPHP unit VII Sarolangun from in honey average was IDR.141,368 per year and the average of kepayang oil amount IDR 19,460 per year with a group aid management systems. Based on the results of the simultaneous recursive equations that there is no-significant differrent between the type of direct marketing channel and through FMU and the FMUP location to the price sharing received by the NTFP farmer. In addition, the farmers's income from Non-timber forest product in a partnerships pattern is significantly influenced by the variable share of the price received by farmers, the amount of NTFP production, harvesting time, the number of family labor incomes, the type of NTFP commodity, the main income of farmers others than NTFPs, and the NTFP management system. Then the existence of KPH as a farmer partner has a significant different on income changes of NTFP farmers, namely the intensity of technology adoption variable, variation in price information, the type of NTFP commodity, farmers capital availabillity, and the NTFP management system (Individual and Group). Furthermore, based on the linear programming analysis, the NTFP business in each FMU faces constraints on the limitations of NTFP raw materials, therefore the optimization of production diversity by the FMUP needs to be adjusted. Priority Strategy for Increasing Income of NTFP Farmers through a partnership pattern through a structural model. The priority factor is the type of NTFP commodity (83%). The structural model of farmers' income from the NTFP business is the priority factors for the type of NTFP commodity (35%), the amount of production (33%), the NTFP partnership management system (32%) Increasing the share of farmers' income from NTFPs towards total farmers' income, the priority factors are farmers' income from NTFPs (39%), total farmers' income (32%), number of workers (29%). Optimizing the NTFP business by KPH with a partnership pattern has 3 priority factors, namely 56% is the production availability factor at the farmer level (raw materials), 24% is the capital availability factor and 20% is the processing factor of NTFP derivative products. Keywords : Non- Timber Forest Product, Partnership, Forest Management Unit.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
