Analisis yuridis penyelesaian sengketa ganti kerugian dalam pengadaan tanah (studi kasus putusan no.10/pdt.P/2017/pn.Tng) = Juridical analysis of settlement of compensation disputes in land acquisition (case study decision no.10 / pdt.P / 2017 / pn.Tng)
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Author
Adlie, Julio
Subject
K Law (General)
Datestamp
2021-08-09 07:07:52
Abstract :
Indonesia in recent years has been intensively carrying out infrastructure development such as toll road construction which has led to the land acquisition of residents. with the enactment of Law No.2 of 2012 concerning land acquisition for the public interest, it should be able to regulate infrastructure development planning procedures that have included procedures for good and correct land acquisition so as not to cause harm to those who need land and those who own land. but as in the case in the Tangerang District Court with No.10 / Pdt.P / 2017 / PN.Tng, there were procedural irregularities carried out by the government as the land acquisition committee. In conducting this research, researchers used a normative juridical method. This is because the author uses library materials as the main data to analyze cases in the preparation of this thesis. Data obtained in compiling this description is secondary data as the main data obtained from library studies, archives, research reports. The result of this research is that the government as the negligent land procurement committee in carrying out the tasks as it should be carried out deliberations before determining the price of land is something that should be done under the applicable law. and in court proceedings that the judge overrides the reason the plaintiff who refers to the applicable law and asks to present an expert witness is not appropriate, because as it is known that expert opinion is a source of non-binding law.
Indonesia in recent years has been intensively carrying out infrastructure development such as toll road construction which has led to the land acquisition of residents. with the enactment of Law No.2 of 2012 concerning land acquisition for the public interest, it should be able to regulate infrastructure development planning procedures that have included procedures for good and correct land acquisition so as not to cause harm to those who need land and those who own land. but as in the case in the Tangerang District Court with No.10 / Pdt.P / 2017 / PN.Tng, there were procedural irregularities carried out by the government as the land acquisition committee. In conducting this research, researchers used a normative juridical method. This is because the author uses library materials as the main data to analyze cases in the preparation of this thesis. Data obtained in compiling this description is secondary data as the main data obtained from library studies, archives, research reports. The result of this research is that the government as the negligent land procurement committee in carrying out the tasks as it should be carried out deliberations before determining the price of land is something that should be done under the applicable law. and in court proceedings that the judge overrides the reason the plaintiff who refers to the applicable law and asks to present an expert witness is not appropriate, because as it is known that expert opinion is a source of non-binding law.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
